A consensus and attestation system for subjective data. Every AI builder asks the same questions about the data they train on, ship, or act on: who reviewed this, and can the review be trusted? PoQ produces a permanent, auditable answer for every item.
Give it any expert output:
PoQ then sends that output to a panel of independent experts.
PoQ is the consensus and provenance layer over expert outputs - so it fits anywhere in your pipeline where you need confidence in an expert's work. The shape is the same regardless of context: a credentialed network reviews each item against your rubric, economically aligned consensus produces a single per-item score, and the result is a portable cryptographic proof.
It sits alongside internal QC on labels, datasets, or agent outputs - upgrading ad-hoc review with structured consensus and a per-item attestation. It layers over eval tooling (Braintrust, Langfuse, Arize) for the cases where confidence matters. It addsprovenance to labeling work (Scale, Surge, Sama, in-house) so a dataset ships with a citable proof. And it stamps consequential AI decisions - an agent's tool call, a model's chain-of-thought, an audit firm's AI-generated finding - with a per-item attestation a downstream party can verify.
The tools you already use stay where they are. PoQ is the consensus and provenance layer over whatever they produce - and some of those vendors will be PoQ customers themselves.